About us and how it works
Last updated: October 16, 2026.
This is a translation; the French version is the one that legally applies.
Who are we?
Who's Right? is an independent site, published by Christelle Chocho, sole proprietor (see the legal notice). The site's texts and the Editors' Dilemmas are written by the Who's Right? editors, under their responsibility.
The idea is simple. After an argument, we all need an outside opinion. But when you ask a friend, they often say you're right, just to be nice. Who's Right? lets you lay both sides on the table and ask for a wider opinion: from your friends and family, from strangers, and even from an AI.
How does it work?
- You tell the argument: your side, then the other person's. The AI can help you reword it, suggests a title and spots details that could identify someone.
- After a review, the argument is posted to the feed: every visitor to the site can vote. You can also send the link to your friends and family, by WhatsApp, text or email.
- Everyone picks one of five verdicts: “You're right,” “You're the one who's wrong,” “Nobody's wrong,” “Everyone's wrong” or “Not enough info.” One vote per person. You can add a short comment, under the nickname of your choice.
- You compare what strangers think, what your friends and family think, and the AI's verdict. If you'd rather keep it low-key, the “Just my friends and family” option limits the argument to people who have the link.
- With your private admin link, you can add an update, for example “we made up,” or delete the argument at any time.
The site is free and doesn't require an account.
Where do the stories come from?
Most stories are told by visitors. They are anonymized and moderated before any public posting. We cannot check whether a story is accurate: we read what the author tells, just like you.
The others are Editors' Dilemmas. These are fictional stories, made up by the editors from common situations, to get the debate going. They always carry the “Editors' Dilemma” badge. We never present them as real-life stories.
How the AI is used
The site uses Claude, an artificial intelligence model from the company Anthropic. It steps in at five points:
- rewording: making the text clearer and more neutral, if you ask;
- anonymizing: spotting and removing names, places and details that could identify someone;
- suggesting a title;
- moderating: checking that an argument follows the rules before it is posted publicly;
- giving an “AI verdict”: an opinion shown separately, clearly marked as coming from the AI.
You always read the suggested text, and you remain free to change it before approving. Only the text is sent to the AI, never your IP address. The details are in the privacy policy.
The limits of the AI
- It can make mistakes, misunderstand humor or irony, or lack nuance.
- It can miss a detail that makes someone identifiable: your own read-through is still essential.
- It can be too strict or too lenient when moderating. Doubtful cases, contested decisions and reports are reviewed by a person.
- Its verdict is based only on the text. And both sides are written by the same person: the AI only knows the other side through your words.
- It is not a judge, a psychologist or a lawyer. Its verdict is an opinion for fun, like the other voters'.
Advertising and traffic measurement
Who's Right? is free thanks to Google AdSense advertising. When you arrive, Google's consent management tool asks for your choice, under the European TCF v2.2 framework. Google Analytics traffic measurement only works after you agree.
Advertising has no influence on moderation or on verdicts. We do not sell your stories. You can change your choices at any time with the “Manage my cookies” link at the bottom of every page.
Write to us
A question, an idea, a mistake to point out? Head to the Contact page.